Substance Abuse Prevention & Treatment Programs

Best Practices

 

Nonprofit Development Institute

2500 W. 4th Street

Wilmington, DE 19805

(302) 656-1100

http://www.rapidproposals.com

 

 

Background Information on the Problem

Alcohol and drug abuse are destructive forces in today’s society.  The negative effects of substance abuse impact not only heavy users and their families but also the public and private sectors.  The financial burden is heaviest for the federal government, state governments, and private sector businesses (Autry, 1999). Alcohol and drug abuse are contributing factors to crime, poverty, prison population, domestic violence, and child abuse rates. Families experience many negative repercussions from the effects of alcoholism in the family.  Alcoholism and drug abuse impact families by increasing rates of domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, divorce, and poverty. According to the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse the highest at-risk category for drug and alcohol abuse in this country is part-time youth workers ages 18-25 years old.  More than one-third of high school students work during the school year, and many more are employed during the summer months (Rubenstein, Sternbach, & Pollack, 1999).  Without intervention, a large portion of the population of part-time employed youths will develop into the population of full-time working abusing adults. 

 

To determine who is in need of specific prevention and treatment interventions, mental health professionals make distinctions about different levels of use.  Nearly everyone uses alcohol or other drugs (including caffeine or tobacco) at some point in their lives.

 

  • Use can be defined as the ingestion of alcohol or other drugs without experiencing negative consequences.

 

  • However, when a person experiences negative consequences from the use of alcohol or other drugs, a pattern of misuse is emerging. The type of drug taken and the characteristics of the individual contribute to the probability of experiencing negative consequences. For example, it is illegal for minors to drink alcohol. Therefore, the probability that a high school student will experience negative consequences from drinking alcohol may be far greater than for an adult. If an adult overuses alcohol and becomes ill or is arrested for DUI, this is also considered misuse. Chances are greater that an adult will experience negative consequences from shooting heroin than from drinking alcohol; not only because alcohol is legal, but also because alcohol is less addictive than heroin.

 

  • Abuse is considered the continued use of alcohol or other drugs in spite of negative consequences. The high school student in the previous example may be grounded for 2 weeks by his parents for drinking at a party. Once the grounding period is completed, if he continues to attend similar parties and drinks again, he has a problem with alcohol abuse. Negative consequences have not curtailed his drinking behavior. If an adult who received a DUI continues to drink and drive, this is also considered abuse.

 

  • Addiction/dependence is the compulsive use of alcohol and other drugs regardless of the consequences. Negative consequences do not discourage use, even if they are very severe, such as extreme stress on a marriage or the likelihood of a prison sentence.

 

The ability to successfully negotiate a transition is important for coping with the next stage of a person’s life.  Hence, the right advice and support, and learning opportunities at the right time, can assist healthy progress through the transition points of life (National Crime Prevention, 1999). Adolescence is the phase of life wherein youths struggle through the transition from childhood to adulthood.  Youths are faced with forging individual identities and finding their places within their communities; at the same time they are just beginning to develop the skills to make adult decisions.  Adolescence is a time of experimentation, while most adolescents do not grasp the negative consequences associated with abuse or feel indestructible.  Part-time jobs can be an opportunity for youths to gain skills such as time management and responsibility and gain self-esteem.  However, employment also brings with it a heightened risk for drug or alcohol abuse in the nation’s young. 

 

Many factors contribute to alcohol and drug abuse in youth.  The National Survey of American Attitudes on Substance Abuse VIII: Teens and Parents reports that the risk of abuse in teens sharply increases if they are highly stressed, frequently bored or have substantial amounts of spending money; also reported was that teens with $25 or more a week in spending money are nearly twice as likely as teens with less to abuse drugs.   Increases in the cost of living have forced numerous youth to work from the primary years of formation into adulthood.  For many young people these part-time jobs provide a vehicle for substance abuse.  The majority of young people employed part-time use their income for recreational purposes.  They have the newfound freedoms associated with their status as young adults of driving cars, relaxed family boundaries, and self-generated spending money.  These freedoms often come without the restraints of adult responsibilities such as home ownership and the demands of a full-time occupation.  Dollars are often used to assist with extra-curricular activities.  Although these activities should be school related or constructive, after time the majority of working students take a different and dangerous track.  

 

Many youth lack access to appropriate recreational activities, which elevates the risks of substance abuse as reported by the National Survey.  Without a healthy alternative, many youths turn to experimentation with alcohol and/or drugs. 

 

A lack of positive adult and peer relationships can contribute, as these relationships help youth build the skills and develop the self-discipline needed to resist alcohol and drugs.  Parents provide the primary source for emotional support for children and provide the foundation for youth’s social and emotional development. Without this support children are put at high-risk for substance abuse and other risky behavior.  It is unfortunate for our youth that the numbers of single-parent homes and double-income homes steadily rise, as this means that more and more children are spending less and less time with their parents at crucial times in their development.  The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University recently published its finding that teens who have dinner with their families two nights a week or less are at double the risk of substance abuse as teens who have frequent dinners.  The older the teens the less likely they are to have dinner with their families, thus the risk for abuse increases with age within the teen population. 

 

The negative effects of substance abuse on youth are manifold.  A young person who abuses alcohol or drugs is more likely to:

 

·         Be in a fatal car accident—Thirty seven percent of youth traffic fatalities in 1996 were directly related to alcohol consumption (NCADI, 2000).

 

·         Contract an STD--Many students report using alcohol or drugs when they have sex, and 1 in 50 high school students reports having injected an illegal drug. Surveillance data from the 34 states with integrated HIV and AIDS reporting systems suggest that drug injection led to at least 6% of HIV diagnoses reported among those aged 13-24 in 2000, with an additional 50% attributed to sexual transmission (CDC, 2002). 

 

·         Become violent—While there are many young people who use drugs and do not become involved in violence, substance use and involvement in violent behavior are clearly interrelated. There is a correlation between the severity and frequency of drug use and the severity and frequency of delinquency (National Youth Violence Prevention Resource Center.

 

·         Risky behavior—Survey results form a nationally representative sample of 8th and 10th graders indicated that alcohol use was significantly associated with both risky behavior and victimization (NIAAA, 1997). 

 

·         Commit Suicide—The strongest risk factors for suicides in youth are depression, drug abuse, and aggressive behavior (National Institute for Mental Health, 2003)

 

·         Become pregnant—Sexually experienced teens that average five or more drinks daily are three times less likely to use condoms (Hingson, Struhin, Berlin & Heeren, 1990).

 

There is a clear correlation between employment status and substance abuse.  Seventy percent of all substance abusers are employed full-time.  Today’s full-time workforce is heavily comprised of alcohol and illicit drug users, with 6.3 million illicit drug users, 6.2 million heavy alcohol users and 1.6 million heavily abusing both (NHSDA, 1997).  7.4% of the part-time workforce uses illicit drugs (); the average among part-time workers is much lower than among full-time workers (OAS Chapter 8).  Occupations with the highest use rates are also those most likely to employ youths—construction, food service, and other service occupations (NHSDA, 1997). 

 

Occupations with highest usage rates are also those with the lowest rates of drug information and policy in the Workplace (NHSDA, 1997). Workplace prevention programs have proven to be successful in combating substance abuse problems on a broad scale.  These programs “can increase Workplace safety and productivity and lower substance abuse and its human and economic costs” (Nelba Chavez, PhD., SAMSHA Administrator).  Studies indicate that employees who receive drug and alcohol information, written drug and alcohol policies, and access to Employee Assistance Programs from their employers are less likely to abuse illicit drugs and alcohol (NHSDA, 1994).  A 1994 study revealed that the greater effort put forth by employers toward substance abuse prevention, the fewer number off employees reported abuse of illicit drugs.  Usage rates steadily decline as employer programs become more pro-active.  For instance, 62.1% of employees reported illicit drug use at companies with information available on alcohol or drug use, whereas only 57.3% reported positively in companies that offered a written policy on alcohol or drug abuse.  That percentage drops to just 34.5 when an employee assistance program is available. Thus as the implementation of workplace prevention programs has increased, the rate of illicit drug use among full-time workers has declined (NHSDA, 1997). 

 

However, the majority of employer-assisted programs are not tailored to youths.  As youth transition into the workforce it is vital that effective intervention and prevention programs are in place. These programs must address the obstacles specific to age and demographics in order to assist youths’ successful transitions into productive, contributing members of adult society.

 

The Public Health Model

 

One prevention goal is to create an environment in which individuals have the opportunity to make healthy choices. The Public Health Model can be used to understand a community, assess factors that contribute to unhealthy choices and lifestyles, and plan specific prevention programs that focus on healthier choices. The model can be applied to any health problem: dental cavities, the flu, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS, for example. In this course, the discussion focuses primarily on the use of the Public Health Model in substance abuse prevention efforts.

 

Image removed

This model promotes the concept of a three-pronged, holistic attack on health problems by targeting three components: host, agent, and environment.

  • The host is the individual affected by the health problem. In the case of substance abuse, the host is the potential or active user of drugs.

  • The agent is the catalyst, substance, or organism causing the health problem. In the case of chicken pox, a virus is the agent. In the case of substance abuse, the agents are the specific drugs causing the problem and the sources, supplies, and availability that make drug use possible.

  • The environment is the context in which the host and the agent exist. The environment creates conditions that increase or decrease the chance that the host will become more susceptible and the agent more effective. In the case of substance abuse, the environment is a family, community, or cultural climate that encourages, supports, reinforces, or sustains problematic use of drugs.

The Public Health Model of prevention, using the science of epidemiology, stresses that problems arise through the relationships and interactions among host, agent, and environment. In the past, prevention programs often neglected to deal with the environment and focused exclusively on inoculating the host through educational efforts, expecting that information on the dangers of drugs would be sufficient to deter use. However, a public health approach requires not only an understanding of how host, agent, and environment interact, but must also include a plan of action for influencing all three.

The Public Health Model can serve as an effective planning tool. A community-wide assessment should include the following questions:

  • Who are the hosts in my community?
  • What are the agents in my community?
  • What can we change in the environment that will have the most effect?

 

Risk Factors That Lead to Substance Abuse

 

Risk factors are the attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and circumstances that put individuals at risk for substance abuse.  The stressors that increase risk of alcohol and other drug use come from many sources.  The more risk factors that are present in the life of an individual, the more likely it is that the individual will begin to use drugs.  By reducing risk factors, the individual becomes less vulnerable to substance abuse and other problem behaviors such as early sexual activity, school dropout, and unsafe driving.

 

Individuals with multiple risk factors are at the highest risk for substance abuse, and they may be candidates for selective or indicated prevention programs.  However, while the presence of multiple risk factors is predictive of drug problems, it remains unclear if particular risk factors actually cause individuals to use alcohol or other drugs.  What is clear is that increasing protective factors can reduce the likelihood of individuals becoming involved in drug use.

 

There are six categories or domains of risk factors:

  • Individual
  • Family
  • Peer
  • School
  • Community
  • Society

 

While there are six categories of risk (and protective) factors, five of those domains interact with the individual, who is at the center in the Web of Influence model.  All stimuli are processed, interpreted, and responded to based upon the characteristics of the individual.

 

Individual Risk Factors

Some important risk factors associated with substance abuse can be thought of as uncontrollable variables.  Among important uncontrollable individual variables is genetic predisposition.  For example, individuals with a strong family history of alcohol abuse may themselves be biologically susceptible to abusing alcohol.  Age is also important, and individuals are considered to be most vulnerable to substance abuse from early adolescence through young adulthood.  Gender does not appear to be associated with increased risk of using drugs.  However, women who smoke tobacco, drink alcohol, or use other drugs are at increased risk for harmful physical effects from these substances.

Controllable variables include the attitudes, beliefs, skills, and behaviors that reside within the individual.  Some important controllable variables that you might want to consider for your proposal are listed below.

 

Individual Risk Factors

  • Early antisocial behavior, such as bullying or meanness
  • Alienation from the dominant values of the society
  • Withdrawal from conventional groups and activities
  • High levels of impulsivity, hostility, or lack of inhibition
  • Unusual levels of rebelliousness
  • First use of any mind-altering substance prior to or during the early teen years
  • Engagement in related problem behaviors such as juvenile delinquency, violence, teen pregnancy, or dropping out of school.

 

Family Environment Risk Factors

The family is the strongest influence on the development of individuals through late childhood.  Family risk factors are the elements of an individual’s home environment that increase the likelihood of becoming involved with drugs.

 

Family Risk Factors

  • Extreme economic deprivation
  • Low expectations of children’s success
  • Unclear expectations of behavior
  • Low levels of monitoring and supervision
  • Inconsistent or harsh discipline
  • Physical abuse, especially from an early age
  • Lack of bonding and caring
  • Conflict (including marital discord) between parents or other caregivers
  • Ignoring or encouraging teen use of alcohol or drugs by parents/caregivers
  • Abuse of alcohol or other drugs by parents/caregivers
  • Parents involving youth in parental use of alcohol or other drugs (For example, "Light my cigarette" or "Get me a beer.")
  • Family history of alcoholism

 

 

It is often assumed that children raised by a single parent are at greater risk for substance abuse, but current evidence suggests that single parenting in and of itself is not a risk factor.  However, high levels of stress frequently pervade the lives of single parents, who often struggle with multiple roles and responsibilities.  They may experience low levels of well-being and self-esteem, have little support, and high levels of depression. If the parent uses alcohol or other drugs or has poor parenting skills, then the children are at risk.

 

Peer Association Risk Factors

The negative influence of peers is well established as one of the most important factors contributing to drug use in youth and young adults.  The relationships and behaviors of an individual’s peer group can substantially increase the risk of an individual becoming involved in substance abuse.

 

 

Peer Risk Factors

  • Association with friends who use alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs
  • Peer pressure to use alcohol and other drugs
  • Friends who do not participate in extracurricular and community-based activities
  • Gang membership
  • Reliance on peers rather than on parents for advice and guidance

 

Young people who associate with peers who use drugs are more likely to use them.  (Similarly, young people whose friends engage in any problem behavior are more likely to engage in the same problem behavior.)  Even when young people come from well-managed families and do not experience other risk factors, just "hanging out" with friends who use drugs greatly increases a young person’s risk of use.  On the other hand, young people who experience few risk factors are far less likely to associate with friends who are engaged in problem behaviors.

 

School-related Risk Factors

School is a central element in the lives of most individuals from early childhood through adolescence.  Experiences in the school environment are a strong influence on people’s lives.  Individuals who have negative experiences in school, especially school failure, are more likely to use alcohol and other drugs.

 

School Risk Factors 

  • Academic failure on a consistent basis
  • Lack of access to remedial programs
  • The transition between schools (e.g., from elementary to middle school or from middle to high school)
  • Lack of student involvement with curricular and extracurricular activities
  • Truancy and suspension
  • Negative, disorderly, and unsafe school climate
  • Low expectations of student achievement on the part of school personnel
  • School policies, rules, and regulations (particularly those related to drug use) not clearly defined or not uniformly enforced
  • High rate of academic failure in the student population
  • High school dropout rate
  • Ready access to drugs within the school environment

 

Beginning in the late elementary grades, academic failure increases the risk of drug use, as well as other problem behaviors.  Programs that focus on building basic skills (such as reading) and reducing academic failure can decrease this risk.  Some students who continue to experience academic failure cease to see the role of student as a viable one for them and lose commitment to school.  These students are at high risk for drug use, as well as for school dropout, delinquency, and teen pregnancy.

 

Community Environment Risk Factors

The risk factors present in the larger community influence the likelihood that an individual will become involved with drugs.  People who live in communities that are impoverished, disorganized, and apathetic are more likely to use drugs than those living in socially cohesive communities.  These same communities are likely to experience high mobility, unemployment, and crime rates, and drugs may be easy to access.

 

Community Risk Factors 

  • Extreme economic and social deprivation (for example, poverty, lack of adequate housing, poor health care, and a sense of no future or improvement in the quality of life
  • Low neighborhood attachment and community disorganization, including a lack of community leadership
  • Apathy on the part of residents and a sense that the community’s problems are unsolvable
  • High crime rates
  • High mobility rate (that is, a large transient population)
  • Lack of employment opportunities
  • Lack of opportunities for youth to become involved with the community
  • Cultural disenfranchisement (that is, the perception that the dominant/mainstream culture is not relevant and does not value the community’s culture)
  • Easy availability of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs
  • Community attitudes, practices, policies, or laws favoring use

 

 

Society-related Risk Factors

 

Societal Risk Factors 

  • Pro-use message in the general media (for example, television shows and popular music)
  • Pro-use messages in advertising (for example, youth-oriented cigarette advertising)
  • National economic and employment conditions
  • Discrimination
  • Marginalization of groups

 

Relationships Among Risk Factors

Youth who are at risk for substance abuse, teenage pregnancy, violence, and gang involvement share similar risk factors.  In addition, the Search Institute (a nonprofit research organization focused on the generation and application of knowledge to promote the well-being of children and adolescents) has used research findings to chart the interrelationships between ATOD and other at-risk behaviors.  For instance, a youth known to be at risk for alcohol use has a 70 percent chance of being at risk in the area of sexuality and an 86 percent chance of being at risk of not using a vehicle safely.

 

Patterns of Co-occurrence of Risk Behaviors

If at-risk in

this area

Then the likelihood of risk in the following areas is:

Alcohol

Tobacco

Illicit Drugs

Sexuality

Depression/

Suicide

Antisocial Behavior

School

Vehicle Safety

Alcohol

--